Women Losing Trust in Political Leaders Shows New Swinburne Research

Share on linkedin
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email

Stay informed about leadership in Australia

Subscribe to access downloadable reports and receive email notifications when new articles are published by the research team.

The current state of political leadership in Australia

A string of shocking incidences from Parliament House has cast a light on its toxic culture, including allegations of ongoing sexual harassment, assault, and rape. From the Brittany Higgins case, to the March 4 Justice, and Scott Morrison’s startling reflection that the march was a ‘triumph’ in that it was ‘not met with bullets’; it is no wonder Australians, and women particularly, are feeling distressed and fed up.

Women are losing trust in our leaders

Mainstream media has commented on women’s deepening sense of anger and sadness, manifesting as distrust in federal government during the current political crisis. A recent poll found that about 68% of Australian women (and 62% of men) agreed with the statement: “The government has been more interested in protecting itself than the interests of those who have been assaulted.” Swinburne University’s Australian Leadership Index (ALI) provides further evidence of the declining levels of public trust in the federal government.

Figure 1: Public perceptions of federal government leadership from 2018-2021, by gender
Figure 1: Public perceptions of federal government leadership from 2018-2021, by gender

As seen in Figure 1, women’s (but not men’s) perceptions of federal leaders took a steep dive from the end of 2020 to the first quarter of 2021 – the period in which a string of scandals were reported by the mainstream media. The noticeable drop in women’s faith in the federal government is alarming and warrants immediate attention to address the needs of the people, which is arguably one of the fundamental responsibilities of leaders and for the greater good of the country.

A need for ethical leadership in parliament

A closer look at the data showcases the importance of some drivers of the public’s assessments of leadership for the greater good. As seen in Figure 2, demonstrating high ethical standards is fundamental to women’s perceptions of federal leadership. Thus, women are more likely to negatively view unethical behaviours by leaders, which in turn degrades public trust.

Figure 2: Importance of federal government leadership demonstrating high ethical standards, by gender
Figure 2: Importance of federal government leadership demonstrating high ethical standards, by gender

The recent trend for Australian women is the importance of ethical conduct. Any effective changes to policy should be data driven and should target falling ethical standards. Strategies need to be transparent and authentic; vague statements and false promises will do nothing to restore dropping levels of public trust.  

Restoring women’s faith and trust in federal leaders

The current problems with parliamentary culture will not be a simple fix, but there are promising long-term initiatives that could begin to be implemented now – ones that are well supported by existing research in ethical leadership and diversity management.

Perpetrators need to be held accountable: Violations that are tolerated become the norm.

Insights from social psychology have shown that when leaders appear to ignore or tolerate unethical behaviors, people within the social group, members of Parliament in this case, will begin to question the importance of existing moral norms and may engage in continued and progressively more serious violations, further eroding ethical standards (e.g. Bandura, 1963; Moore et al., 2019). Now is not the time to play politics, to avoid taking a stand by hiding behind vague statements. A clear signal is needed to show these acts will not be tolerated. Women in Australia need to see that their Prime Minister is going to act to disrupt the current toxic culture in order for public trust to be restored.

Critical mass of women in politics: It takes more than a token woman (or a few token women) to incite changes to policy or workplace culture.

One of the most immediate solutions is appointing more women into high level positions, a strategy that the Morrison government seems to be trying in the recently announced ‘cabinet shuffle’. It is worth noting that there are still some concerns about the backlash that strategically appointed women might face (Krook, 2015), including being seen as being unfairly appointed over more qualified others just because of their sex (e.g., Gillespie & Ryan, 2012; Leslie et al., 2014). However, this reshuffle is likely a step in the right direction for restoring trust to female constituents. Continued support for newly appointed cabinet members will be vital in the upcoming months.  

Increased transparency: The role of independent reviews and committees

When trust in an institution is low, one way to ease the public’s concerns is by increasing the transparency of decisions, actions, and strategies for addressing problematic behaviour. The independent review into parliamentary workplaces by Sex Discrimination Commissioner, Kate Jenkins, is a great first step. Additionally, the federal government should consider appointing an independent committee to investigate and implement a series of evidence-based interventions aimed at restoring ethical standards in the workplace. The outcomes of this process could then be disseminated to all Australian workplaces, as a further display of the transparency of initiatives and as a way for all organisations to implement solid policies around workplace behaviour.

Media Enquiries

To get in touch with the research team for comments, interviews, or to discuss the research, please click the button below.

About the Australian Leadership Index

The Australian Leadership Index is a national leadership survey that provides a comprehensive picture of leadership for the greater good in Australia. Made possible by the generous support of the Graham Foundation, the Australian Leadership Index is nationally significant for a number of reasons.

It is the largest ever study of leadership for the greater good. Each quarter, the ALI surveys 1,000 people across Australia about their beliefs about leadership for the greater good by Australian organisations and institutions. The ALI also reveals how institutions in different sectors vary in terms of leadership for the greater good, as well as the drivers of these perceptions, revealing new insights into what institutional leaders can do to show leadership for the greater good. Finally, by making all ALI data freely available via the ALI data portal, the Australian Leadership Index provides the public, journalists and leaders with a powerful new tool to help bring forth the leadership Australia needs for the future Australians want.

Follow us on Twitter or LinkedIn for regular updates, or subscribe to access downloadable reports and receive email notifications when new articles are published by the research team.

Recent articles


Explainer: the common good and why it matters more than ever

Although the term ‘civilisation’ has less currency today than it once did (Armstrong, 2009), most people see themselves as living in a civilisation (Saul, 2009). As observed by the political philosopher John Ralston Saul, this understanding tends to be centred on a sense of shared destiny: on shared interests, collective purpose, and a common future. Seemingly abstract, the idea of shared destiny is actually quite familiar. Colloquially, we know this as the common good or its synonyms: the public or greater good.

Leadership written in chalk on a blackboard

Reflections on the common good and the future of leadership for the common good

Leadership for the common good requires an individual and collective ability and willingness to overcome our Manichaean tendencies. It calls on us to foster the conditions that make it possible to imagine how apparent contradictions can be reconciled. And it calls on us to cultivate the conditions in which we can develop a sense of shared reality, collective purpose, and shared destiny.

A person holding a plant in their hand

The paradox of virtue signalling

While a brand can align itself with and support social causes, ultimately, its existence relies on generating revenue and profit. As such, positioning a brand as virtuous is a challenging and, at times, paradoxical task for marketing practitioners.

Scroll to Top

Have you downloaded our 2020 annual report?

Click the button below to download the full PDF version of the annual report, and receive email updates about new articles and reports as they are released.