What We Can Learn About Leadership from Cuomo’s Resignation

Share on linkedin
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email

Stay informed about leadership in Australia

Subscribe to access downloadable reports and receive email notifications when new articles are published by the research team.

Written by Melissa Wheeler and Sylvia Gray.

The public expects more ethical and responsible leadership, now more than ever.

Key points:

  • New York Governor Andrew Cuomo resigns after an investigation revealed inappropriate misconduct.
  • Scandals such as this capture the public’s attention and erode trust in leaders, as evidenced by global public opinion polls.
  • Public trust is low but can be restored if leaders focus on accountability and are driven by a sense of purpose.

Leaders’ decisions and actions take place in the public arena, where laudable actions are applauded and scandals have consequences. Turn on the news any day, and you’ll see a new example of a corporate leader or government official whose missteps have led to public scrutiny and, in some, cases, forced resignations and or criminal investigations.

This week in the spotlight was New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s resignation from office following allegations of sexual harassment against the former governor. Cuomo’s initial response to these allegations was delayed, and his strategy was one of denial, rationalizing that the women who made allegations were misinterpreting his behaviors and intentions. In an attempt to explain, Cuomo created a montage of photographed interactions of him kissing and touching a variety of people of different genders, ages, and cultural backgrounds, which was not well received. Lt. Gov. Kathy Hochul will replace Cuomo, becoming the first female governor in the state of New York.

Why do such scandals grab the public eye?

Misconduct and corruption might resonate quite strongly with people who are feeling let down by their leaders. The public has certain expectations of its leaders. The public grants a political leader power to make decisions, to hold office, and to represent their needs – which confers many advantages to that leader, including reach, influence, and power. Public opinion surveys highlight the eroding trust in government, as seen in Pew Research Center’s Public Trust in Government poll, where less than one-quarter of Americans believe they can trust the government to do what is right “just about always” or “most of the time.” This dissatisfaction is a reflection of the high standards the public expects of its leaders. Public opinion surveys around the globe, including the Australian Leadership Index, continually show that people expect responsible leadership, including accountability and ethicality.

In return for appointing and following leaders, the public wants to feel protected, to be heard, and to be treated fairly. These scandals end with people feeling exploited by their leaders and may include even a sense of being duped for putting loyalty and trust in the wrong individuals. The social contract (expectations of roles of leaders and followers) has been violated in these incidences, further eroding public trust.

How can trust be restored?

When we read about scandals showcasing the misconduct of leaders, relying on hindsight, we can clearly see that something was missing along the way. And that something is a kind of decision-making needed to anticipate ethical challenges and to avoid missteps. We often talk about ethics only in the aftermath of a scandal, but not as a means to evaluate decisions and actions before or as situations unfurl.

Let’s not wait to talk about ethics until the scandal hits – let’s make it part of the conversation when we begin putting plans into place. Leaders can begin to restore trust by asking themselves some basic, but challenging questions: “Who do you want to be?” and “What do you want to contribute?”.


Wilson, S., Gray, S., Bednall, T., Pallant, J., Wheeler, M., & Demsar, V. (2021). Australian Leadership Index: 2020 national survey report, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne. https://doi.org/10.25916/z9h8-sg12.


Media Enquiries

To get in touch with the research team for comments, interviews, or to discuss the research, please click the button below.

About the Australian Leadership Index

The Australian Leadership Index is a national leadership survey that provides a comprehensive picture of leadership for the greater good in Australia. Made possible by the generous support of the Graham Foundation, the Australian Leadership Index is nationally significant for a number of reasons.

It is the largest ever study of leadership for the greater good. Each quarter, the ALI surveys 1,000 people across Australia about their beliefs about leadership for the greater good by Australian organisations and institutions. The ALI also reveals how institutions in different sectors vary in terms of leadership for the greater good, as well as the drivers of these perceptions, revealing new insights into what institutional leaders can do to show leadership for the greater good. Finally, by making all ALI data freely available via the ALI data portal, the Australian Leadership Index provides the public, journalists and leaders with a powerful new tool to help bring forth the leadership Australia needs for the future Australians want.

Follow us on Twitter or LinkedIn for regular updates, or subscribe to access downloadable reports and receive email notifications when new articles are published by the research team.

Recent articles


Explainer: the common good and why it matters more than ever

Although the term ‘civilisation’ has less currency today than it once did (Armstrong, 2009), most people see themselves as living in a civilisation (Saul, 2009). As observed by the political philosopher John Ralston Saul, this understanding tends to be centred on a sense of shared destiny: on shared interests, collective purpose, and a common future. Seemingly abstract, the idea of shared destiny is actually quite familiar. Colloquially, we know this as the common good or its synonyms: the public or greater good.

Leadership written in chalk on a blackboard

Reflections on the common good and the future of leadership for the common good

Leadership for the common good requires an individual and collective ability and willingness to overcome our Manichaean tendencies. It calls on us to foster the conditions that make it possible to imagine how apparent contradictions can be reconciled. And it calls on us to cultivate the conditions in which we can develop a sense of shared reality, collective purpose, and shared destiny.

A person holding a plant in their hand

The paradox of virtue signalling

While a brand can align itself with and support social causes, ultimately, its existence relies on generating revenue and profit. As such, positioning a brand as virtuous is a challenging and, at times, paradoxical task for marketing practitioners.

Scroll to Top

Have you downloaded our 2020 annual report?

Click the button below to download the full PDF version of the annual report, and receive email updates about new articles and reports as they are released.